How to Comment a Perfect Essay on Peer Review?
Giving an effective peer review: sample framework and comments
Chad Musick, PhD, and Caryn Jones | Writing
Here, we'll wait at the basic tenets of peer review, and we've provided a sample framework to assist new reviewers requite comments that volition help authors strengthen their papers.
Basic tenets of peer reviewing:
There are 5 basic tenets that should exist kept in heed:
- Decline the review if you take any conflicts of interest (COIs).
- Remember that you lot're advising the periodical editor, not making the decision about whether to accept or reject.
- Try to be helpful and always respectful to the author.
- Maintain confidentiality of the paper contents.
- Decline the review if you are too busy, or not familiar enough with the topic, to complete a proper review.
1
Peer reviews are intended to be impartial (unbiased), and so anyone asked to be a reviewer should consider, before accepting, whether they have any COIs. Annihilation that could make you, as a reviewer, consider the paper more or less favorably because of your relationship with the author is a COI. Yous should decline to review, or at minimum disembalm to the journal editor, papers written by (a) past co-authors of yours, (b) members of your department, (c) your students or mentors, (d) personal friends, and (eastward) professional rivals. Y'all should also decline if yous will gain whatsoever potential fiscal or personal benefits from publication of the work. If you are unsure virtually whether a conflict of interest exists, cheque the journal's guidelines or with the journal editor. Equally examples of COI policies, Elsevier has a general factsheet on COIs and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors provides information about peer reviewer responsibilities.
two
The reviewer acts as an advisor to the journal editor. Considering of this, the review should be more than than a simple "accept" or "reject". When writing a review, you should describe the reasons for the recommendation so that the editor can make an informed decision. It is far more important to annotate on the academic content of a paper than on grammar and punctuation. However, if the language is as well poor to understand the contents adequately, then warning the journal editor. See below for a sample framework that will assist you in ensuring that you've covered the about important points in your review.
3
The review volition be sent to the author of the paper. Because of this, reviewers are in a stiff position to advise the author on how the newspaper could be strengthened. Whether you are recommending acceptance or rejection, the author could benefit from your feedback and advice. One detail circumspection is when y'all want to propose the authors cite your own papers—practice this sparingly. The review should be intended to help the author, non the reviewer. Finally, reviews should be respectful in tone. Unfortunately, nosotros've all seen derogatory and unhelpful reviewer comments at times, which practice not help the author. Peer review should be collegial and respectful.
iv
Reviewers receive submitted papers with the understanding that they are handling confidential communications. As such, they should not discuss the review or disembalm whatsoever of its content to third parties. Reviewers also should not apply their knowledge of the work they are reviewing to further their own personal interests.
5
Reviewers who are not able to provide a proper review, due to lack of time or lack of expertise in the area covered past the paper, should decline the review.
Sample Framework for Your Reviewer Comments
Many journals provide reviewers with a class to fill up out during review, but the framework below tin can exist used in other cases.
Describe the basic contribution of the paper. This should be a few sentences on the topic of the paper. Showtime with this helps the periodical editor and lets the author know that you've understood the paper.
"This newspaper discusses _______________. The main contribution of the paper is ____________."
Give your recommendation. Y'all tin can use one of the following sentences.
"I recommend that this paper be accepted."
"I recommend that this paper be accustomed after pocket-sized revision."
"I recommend that this paper not exist accustomed without major revision."
"I recommend that this paper be rejected."
Give your reasons for your recommendation. Label these as "major comments". A few examples are given to the right.
Major comments:
- The statistical analysis in this paper is suitable/unsuitable for….
- In terms of experimental technique, this paper is conventional/novel, and so…
- The Methods section does non clearly explain…
- The results obtained will exist useful in…
- Some of the fundamental/recent papers in the field are not cited, among these…
- I would like to run into some give-and-take of the findings of the papers in relation to recent findings and developments in ______.
Finally, give some additional comments virtually the newspaper. This is where you can note bug with spelling and/or grammar, suggest changes to figures and tables, and brand other specific comments. Label these as "minor comments". A few examples are to the correct.
Modest comments:
- In several places, you've used the term _____, simply it seems you mean _____.
- In some of the figures, the legends are besides small to be legible.
- On page ____, information technology is stated that _____, but the paper by Smith et al. states that ______. Can you lot comment on this disparity?
- Have you thought about testing this with _____________?
Summary
Nosotros hope you've establish these tips useful. We currently offer back up for new and experienced reviewers in a number of means, including by translating their comments to English and by editing their English comments to ensure that the authors receiving the review have high-quality, well-worded comments that assist them strengthen their manuscripts.
Also, if you have any questions about writing constructive reviewer comments, please practise let usa know. We're happy to support you in this of import academic task.
Stay upward to date
Our monthly newsletter offers valuable tips on writing and presenting your research most effectively, every bit well as advice on fugitive or resolving common problems that authors face up.
Do you have a question nearly bookish writing or publishing?
Our online Q&A support service offers researchers, physicians, and academics quick and easy online access to specialist editors.
Ask questions and receive the answers in English or Japanese.
Source: https://thinkscience.co.jp/en/articles/effective-peer-review
0 Response to "How to Comment a Perfect Essay on Peer Review?"
ارسال یک نظر